Sunday, January 8, 2012

Opinionator | Borderlines: Fighting over Parsley

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
BorderlinesBorderlines explores the global map, one line at a time.

On July 11, 2002, six Moroccan gendarmes occupied Isla de Perejil [1], or Parsley Island, an uninhabited, Spanish-administered rock of about 37 acres, just 220 yards off the Moroccan coast. If the standoff had lasted longer than a few days, and if blood had actually been spilled, we might now know it as the Parsley War. But on July 18, they were overwhelmed and forcibly ejected by Equipo 31, a crack team of Spanish special forces soldiers. No shots were fired.

And that was that. Morocco and Spain agreed to return to the status quo ante [2]: Spain’s claim to the island would remain disputed, but not actively challenged, by Morocco. The island itself would remain unoccupied by either side. Isla de Perejil’s non-occupation is now closely monitored by both the Moroccans and the Spanish (though it’s unclear whether the Moroccan goatherd who occasionally used to graze his flock on the island now has to show his passport).

Apart from that, the case seems closed. But in this part of the world, few things are merely what they seem [3]. Known to the ancients as the Pillars of Hercules, the strategically important gateway between the Atlantic and the Mediterranean is laced with mirroring versions of history — a commodity in no short supply here. Those versions of history have even left mirroring border phenomena on either side of the Strait of Gibraltar.

Perejil is one of seven Spanish territories on and off the Moroccan coast, once known collectively as “plazas de soberanía.” The two main ones are Ceuta and Melilla, two cities on the African mainland. Formerly called the “Major Plazas,” they are now each enjoying a separate, autonomous status within Spain. The remaining “Minor Plazas,” apart from Perejil, are all garrisoned with Spanish soldiers: the Islas Chafarinas, a three-island archipelago near the Algerian border; Alboran, a flat and empty fleck of land flanked by tiny Isla de las Nubes; and finally Pe?ón [4] de Alhucemas (which includes the two minuscule islets called Isla de Tierra and Isla de Mar) and Pe?ón de Vélez de la Gomera, both on Morocco’s central Mediterranean coast, not far from the city of El Hoceima. Morocco claims both autonomous cities and all of the plazas, except Alboran, 30 miles out to sea, the only bit of Spanish North Africa not hugging the Moroccan coastline.

Joe Burgess/The New York Times

Opposite Ceuta, across the STROG [5], is Gibraltar (“Gib” in British parlance), captured by the British in 1704 and granted to them “in perpetuity” by the Treaty of Utrecht, which ended the War of Spanish Succession in 1713. The Spanish have never accepted the loss of Gibraltar, besieging it on three occasions and most recently blockading it from 1969 to 1985.

It seems illogical, not to mention a bit petty, of the Spanish to demand the return of Gibraltar while they cling to their toeholds on the Moroccan side. But Spain’s position is cherry-picked from two opposing principles: Either occupying strategic bits of another country’s coast is an affront to its territorial integrity, in which case Spain can rightly claim Gibraltar but has to renounce its plazas and autonomous cities in North Africa, or Spain’s historic rights to those places can be maintained forever, in which case the same applies for British sovereignty over Gibraltar.

Naturally, Spain has an internally consistent way out of this conundrum: Ceuta and Melilla were Spanish cities long before present-day Morocco existed [6], so it can’t claim them. But Gibraltar was ripped from the bosom of the Spanish state and has been a British colony ever since — in fact, the last colony on European soil [7]. And what should happen to colonies? Right, they should be decolonized.

Another solution, examined first by the British in 1917 and then proposed independently by Spain’s King Alfonso in 1926, was an exchange between Spain and Britain, with Gibraltar reverting to Spain and Ceuta (and possibly also Melilla) becoming British. The swap would have been an interesting new chapter in the long association of Ceuta and Gibraltar. Both exclaves, barely 14 miles apart, poke into the strait, guarding this chokepoint of naval traffic between the Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Seen from above, they look like the hinges of a door that can be opened and shut by whomever controls them. Seen from the sea, Gibraltar’s Rock and Ceuta’s Monte Hacho [8] could be mistaken for the northern and southern pillars of a gigantic gate.

Google Earth

In fact, both rocks are the actual Pillars of Hercules known to the ancients, named after the legendary hero because they marked the westernmost extent of his 12 Labors. To the Greeks and Romans, the Pillars of Hercules were the proverbial end of the world. Tradition has it that the inscription on them warned “Nec Plus Ultra,” or “Beyond this, there’s nothing.”

That changed when Columbus brought back news of lands beyond the ocean, and riches beyond compare. The personal badge of Emperor Charles V, who ruled Spain soon after the discovery of the Americas, showed both pillars interwoven with the slogan: “Plus Ultra” — “There is more out there,” the perfect motto for a nascent transatlantic empire. Charles’s badge is at the origin of Spain’s coat of arms (which still shows both pillars), and possibly also of the dollar sign [9] — the two vertical bars being abstract renderings of Gibraltar and Ceuta, and the curling motto reduced to the S-shape that connects them.

(Nec) Plus Ultra: the pillars as endpoint or gateway. Again, two competing versions of history. And Ceuta and Gibraltar are connected by yet another history with two wildly differing versions. Early in the Eighth Century, Julian [10], a count tasked with “holding Ceuta for Christendom,” switched sides, exhorting and aiding the Muslim invaders of North Africa to cross the strait to Spain. The Muslim conquest of the Iberian Peninsula began when their general Tariq ibn Ziyad landed at Mons Calpe in 711, henceforth renamed Jebel Tariq — i.e. Gibraltar.

Legend has it that Julian wanted revenge for the honor of his daughter Florinda, ravished by Roderic, the last Visigoth king of Spain. Muslim sources later described her as innocence incarnate, while Christian scribes depicted her as a loose woman — respectively maximizing and minimizing Julian’s casus belli. In Spanish history, Julian is the ultimate traitor, opening up the country to seven centuries of Moorish rule. But in his 1970 novel “Count Julian,” the Spanish writer Juan Goytisolo takes the alleged traitor’s side, relishing in the destruction of Spain.

Examples of this mutability of allegiance persist across the strait. Spain’s claims to Gibraltar are supported by … Morocco — for surely, a return of Gib to Spain must mean a return of Ceuta to Morocco. Spain’s claims to Perejil are supported by Algeria, Morocco’s unfriendly neighbor, but not by Spain’s fellow European Union member France, Morocco’s former colonial overlord.

Perhaps Gibraltar is the northernmost part of Africa, for its Barbary Macaques are the only monkeys living in the wild in Europe [11]. And maybe Melilla is the southernmost city of Europe, because its Capilla de Santiago (St James’s Chapel) is the only gothic church in Africa.

All the while, the peculiar borders of these exclaves persist, and harden and soften according to circumstance. Spain and Britain’s co-membership of the European Union was instrumental in ending the blockade of Gibraltar, normalizing the border at La Linea — no longer a three-quarter mile strip of no man’s land garnished with barbed wire.

Read previous contributions to this series.

But the persistent disagreement between Spain and Morocco over the plazas, coupled with an increase in undocumented migration from Africa into Europe, has put Spain on the spot. For many thousands of poor Africans seeking a better life in Europe, Ceuta and Melilla are the entry points into the First World. The barbed-wire fence around both territories is hardly an impediment for those daring and hardy enough to trek across the Sahara.

Some in Spain suspect the periodic surges of migrants into its two African cities are co-orchestrated by Morocco, to underscore their untenability as Spanish, and EU, exclaves in Africa. But ironically, the surges more likely result from the improved Spanish surveillance of the strait, which many migrants try to cross. Like the flow of a river, the phenomenon of mass migration simply seeks the most convenient channel for its course. Hence the poor, huddled masses of boat people reaching Italy’s southernmost island Lampedusa, and likewise the Canary Islands, Spain’s archipelago off Morocco’s Atlantic coast.

For them too, the Strait of Gibraltar no longer is the Nec Plus Ultra of their dreams.

Frank Jacobs is a London-based author and blogger. He writes about cartography, but only the interesting bits.

[1] The official Moroccan nomenclature is “Tura,” which in Berber means “uninhabited,” but also used is “Leila,” which probably is a loan from the Spanish “la isla” (“the island”).

[2] In full: status quo ante bellum, “the state of things before the war.” This principle of international law holds that territorial conquest in battle should be nullified after the end of hostilities. The opposite principle, used to justify territorial gains, is uti possidetis — in full, uti possidetis, ita possideatis, “as you possessed [it], you shall possess [it] from now on.”

[3] For starters, how about the intriguing similarities between the Parsley Incident and the Falklands War, fought two decades earlier? Both involve failed attempts by former European colonies to reclaim islands off their coast held by former European superpowers. Kennedy-Lincoln assassination similarity buffs, start your engines!

[4] Literally a crag (a steep rocky outcrop), the Spanish word pe?ón has also come to mean a Spanish military outpost at such a location. Apart from the two mentioned here, other examples include the Pe?ón de Argel (i.e. Algiers), occupied by Spain from 1510 to 1529.

[5] Naval speak for the Strait of Gibraltar.

[6] 1640 and 1497, respectively. Morocco became independent from France in early 1956. Spanish Morocco — a protectorate since 1912 , not to be confused with the plazas — was allowed to join French Morocco in independence a few months later.

[7] Gibraltar had the status of Crown Colony from 1830 to 1981; in 2002, it was re-classified as a British Overseas Territory. Gibraltar has its own elected government, and thus claims no longer to be a colony, but Spain resists attempts to remove it from the UN Special Committee on Decolonization’s list of Non-Self-Governing Territories (16 at present, of which 10 are under British jurisdiction).

[8] Elevations 1,400 and 670 feet respectively; another candidate for the southern pillar is the Jebel Musa (2,800 feet), just beyond Ceuta’s border with Morocco.

[9] The pillars were pictured on the reverse of the Spanish dollar, legal tender in the United States until 1857.

[10] He might also have been called Urbano, or Ulban. He may have been a Berber, a Visigoth or a Byzantine. Perhaps he was the local ruler of Ceuta, or merely its governor. [11] According to tradition, the extinction of the Gibraltar macaques would signal the end of British rule over the Rock. A similar legend requires the Tower of London to house six raven, lest the monarchy should fail.


View the original article here

World Briefing | Africa: South Sudan: Civilians Flee

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
An Innocent in America Room for Debate: Are Teachers Overpaid? China Set to Punish Human Rights Activist A Renewed Optimism for Deals On Wall Street Competing histories across the Strait of Gibraltar contribute to its peculiar exclaves.

‘Glee’ Star Gets His Broadway Turn Medicare should demand evidence that a costly cancer treatment is more effective than cheaper options.

In Nigeria, designating Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist group will only inflame anti-Americanism among Muslims.


View the original article here

Workers Locked Out at Caterpillar Locomotive Plant in Canada

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

The action came after the employees in London, Ontario, rejected a contract proposed by Electro-Motive Canada. The Canadian Auto Workers union said the proposal would cut wages in half, substantially reduce benefits and end the current pension plan.

“It’s not really a proposal, it’s an ultimatum,” said Tim Carrie, president of the union local that represents the factory’s workers. “This is an attack on middle-class jobs.”

On a Web site with updates about the dispute, Electro-Motive, which Caterpillar acquired in 2010, said the lockout would remain in effect “until a ratified contract is in place.”

The company said the union’s decision not to strike constituted “acceptance of the new wages and benefits as represented in EMC’s final offer.” The company said it was “hopeful of a speedy ratification allowing union members to return to work.”

But some of the union’s executive members have suggested that Caterpillar’s contract demands were intended to provoke a shutdown of the Canadian factory as a prelude to moving all production to the United States.

Caterpillar has a long history of tough labor negotiations and bitter labor disputes. In 1995, workers at the company’s unionized operations in the United States returned to work after declaring a 17-month strike a failure. In 2009, workers took executives at Caterpillar France hostage during a dispute over the restructuring of operations in Grenoble.

Electro-Motive is the second-largest maker of locomotives in North America, after General Electric, and for most of its history was a unit of General Motors. While the parent company, Electro-Motive Diesel, is based in LaGrange, Ill., its only assembly plant in recent years has been the Canadian operation.

But last October, Progress Rail, Caterpillar’s rail operations holding company, opened a new locomotive assembly plant in Muncie, Ind.

The Canadian Auto Workers say that wages and benefits are substantially lower at the new American factory.

The union has suggested that, in addition to reducing labor costs, the company may also want to end Canadian production to avoid potential problems with “Buy American” provisions of United States government procurement rules. While the United States government has said that Canada is exempt from any such measures, labor leaders say that has not always been the case in practice.

The purchase of Electro-Motive Canada was reviewed by the Canadian government under the nation’s foreign investment laws. The union has asked the government to release what conditions, if any, were attached to the subsequent approval. The Canadian government recently settled a dispute with United States Steel under those laws after the company shut down a Canadian steel maker shortly after acquiring it.

“When a foreign company comes in and purchases an existing facility, there has to be a benefit to Canadians,” said Mr. Carrie, the union executive. “Americans coming in and trying to slash wages in half is not a benefit to Canadians.”

Industry Canada, the government department that handles investment reviews, was closed for the New Year holiday on Monday and did not respond to requests for comment.

Anne Marie Quinn, a spokeswoman for Electro-Motive Canada, declined to answer questions about the company’s contract demands, its long-term production plans or any commitments made to the Canadian government.

The company’s Web site about the labor dispute, though, said that the cost of wages and benefits for its workers in Illinois, who are represented by the United Automobile Workers, is about half that for the London plant.

The site says that the now-expired contract at the Canadian factory “also has?antiquated work rules that make the London operation inefficient.”


View the original article here

Saturday, January 7, 2012

President Lee Myung-bak of South Korea Predicts Changes in Peninsula

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Kim Jong-un visited with members of a tank division in a photograph released Sunday by North Korea's official news agency.

SEOUL, South Korea — President Lee Myung-bak of South Korea vowed on Monday to “deal strongly with any provocations” from the North, predicting a “big change” on the divided Korean Peninsula following the death of the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-il, and his untested young son’s rise to power.

Metro Twitter Logo.Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.

In his nationally televised New Year’s speech, Mr. Lee did not elaborate on what change he foresaw. But policy-makers and analysts in the region are closely watching whether the designated successor in the North, Kim Jong-un, who is believed to be in his 20s, can consolidate his grip on power or will depend on caretakers and even regents to run the country, and how that might affect the country’s external policies, especially its nuclear weapons programs.

“A big change is expected in the situation on the Korean Peninsula and northeast Asia following the death of Chairman Kim Jong-il,” Mr. Lee said. “The situation on the Korean Peninsula is now entering a new turning point. But there should be a new opportunity amid changes and uncertainty.”

Mr. Lee’s warning against North Korean provocations came amid fears that the North, as it has in the past, might attempt military or terrorist attacks on the South to reinforce internal unity at a time of sensitive transition and to boost a new leader’s military credentials.

Over the weekend, North Korea made Mr. Kim supreme commander of the 1.2 million-member Korean People’s Army, a move considered crucial to protecting his power, and issued a series of statements calling Mr. Lee’s government in Seoul “national traitors” and vowing “punishment” and “revenge.”

Mr. Lee, though, kept open the possibility of inter-Korean talks despite North Korea’s repeated statements that it had no intention of dealing with his government.

“It is South and North Korea, before anyone else, that must try to achieve the task of building peace, security and reunification on the Korean Peninsula,” he said. “We are leaving a window of opportunity open. If North Korea shows its attitude of sincerity, a new era on the Korean Peninsula can be opened.”

He urged North Korea to suspend its nuclear activities, including its uranium-enrichment program, so that six-nation talks can resume to discuss eliminating its nuclear weapons programs in return for security guarantees and economic assistance for the North.

Mr. Lee’s speech came a day after North Korea issued a New Year’s Day statement that sought to cement support for Mr. Kim and his family’s dynastic rule. It also lambasted South Korea for not expressing official condolences for Kim Jong-il’s death.

In his speech, Mr. Lee called taming inflation and creating jobs two of his top goals as he entered his last year in office. (By law, he cannot run in the next presidential election in December.) He also apologized for a recent series of corruption scandals that implicated his former aides and relatives.

“While economic growth is important, I will focus on bringing consumer prices down,” he said, promising to keep inflation below 3.5 percent this year. South Korea’s consumer prices rose 4.2 percent last month.


View the original article here

WORLD: A Date With the Censors

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Reality TV shows have become common on Chinese television but the sometimes racy and materialistic content has attracted the attention of China’s censors.

Produced by Jonah M. Kessel and Edward Wong


View the original article here

The Lede Blog: Activists Document Raids on Civil Society Groups and a Protest in Cairo

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
A video interview with Julie Hughes, the director of the National Democratic Institute’s office in Egypt, which was raided by the authorities on Thursday, posted online by Wafd, an Egyptian political party.

Updated | 8:01 p.m. As my colleagues David Kirkpatrick and David Goodman report, “Egyptian security forces stormed the offices of 17 nonprofit groups around the country on Thursday, including at least three democracy-promotion groups financed by the United States, as part of what Egypt’s military-led government has said is an investigation into ‘foreign hands’ in the recent outbreak of protests.”

Sarah Carr, a journalist and rights activist, uploaded several photographs of the raid on the office of the National Democratic Institute, which is financed by the United States government and affiliated with the Democratic Party.

While Ms. Carr was forced to observe the raid from outside the organization’s office, she was also in touch with Hana Elhattab, an Egyptian who works with the National Democratic Institute and posted several updates on her Twitter feed from inside the office during the raid. In a series of updates over the course of about two hours, she reported that the heavily-armed officers refused to allow employees to leave the premises, were “taking pictures like it’s a crime scene” and confiscated equipment, “even taking empty flip charts, personal laptops, and Skype conferencing equipment.”

Ms. Elhattab managed to keep providing updates on the raid as it unfolded, and her Twitter timeline detailed the anger and frustration of an Egyptian working to promote democracy being treated like a criminal by the country’s military government.

Since the raid came on the same day that some Egyptian officers were acquitted of killing protesters on Jan. 28, the day that Egypt’s revolution took hold, Ms. Elhattab also used her Twitter feed to express her rage.

Another activist blogger who documented the raid from outside the National Democratic Institute office, Mostafa Hussein, posted on his Twitter feed a photograph of boxes of confiscated equipment, and wrote: “At NDI, they’re confiscating everything. Video conf. equip, printers, laptops, server. There is an archive at the garage they’re going thru.”

The security forces also raided the Cairo office of a similar democracy-promoting organization affiliated with the Republican Party, the International Republican Institute. As the blogger Mohamed El Dahshan noted on Twitter, the Egyptian newspaper Al Ahram reported last month that an Egyptian government investigation into the finances of nonprofit groups said that the the N.D.I. and I.R.I. had received $6.7 million from the State Department this year.

Shadi Hamid, the director of research at the Brookings Doha Center, observed, the Egyptian military, which takes $1.3 billion in aid a year from the United States, is not well-placed to argue that groups sponsored by the American government are suspect.

Despite the fact that they accept so much money from the U.S. government themselves, Egypt’s military rulers seem to be emulating the Kremlin, which temporarily suspended the work of both the National Democratic Institute and the International Republican Institute in 2006, after accusing them of instigating or assisting the so-called “color revolutions” in other former Soviet republics.

Earlier this month, the Russian government harassed Golos, an election-monitoring group partially financed by the United States through the N.D.I. As my colleague Ellen Barry reported, on the eve of Russia’s parliamentary elections, state-controlled television “aired a documentary suggesting that Golos was being used by Western governments to spark Arab-spring-style civil unrest after the Russian elections.”

Later on Thursday, a number of activists posted photographs and text updates on the progress of a protest march in Cairo, which drew attention to the plight of a blogger who was jailed in April for “insulting the military” on Facebook.

As The Lede explained in a previous post on the jailed Coptic Christian blogger, Maikel Nabil, the fact that he is both an opponent of Egypt’s military and an outspoken supporter of Israel makes his case unusually complicated.

However, discontent with the military rulers of the country has grown since his arrest. As this video — produced by Aalam Wassef, an activist campaigning for the blogger’s release — shows, his supporters argue that Mr. Nabil was one of the first to suggest that the army was not, in fact, on the side of the protesters.As the video indicates, Mr. Nabil was prosecuted after he argued on his blog that the revolutionary slogan “The People and the Army Are One Hand” was misguided from the start.

Since many Egyptians without access to the Internet or satellite channels never see video like this documenting abuses by the military government, activists have started to bring projectors with them to protests, to screen the footage in public. An activist who writes on Twitter as The Big Pharaoh posted this image on Thursday night of video of a recent attack on protesters by soldiers on the outside wall of Egypt’s high court.


View the original article here

American Awaits Verdict After Iran Spy Trial, Report Says

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Amir Mirza Hekmati, a 28-year-old of Iranian descent, could face the death penalty if found guilty of cooperating with a hostile government and spying for the CIA. He was arrested in December.

Iran's Intelligence Ministry accused Hekmati of receiving training at U.S. bases in neighboring Afghanistan and Iraq.

Shortly after his detention, state television showed a taped interview of him confessing to being a spy. At his trial he admitted to having links with the CIA but said he had no intention of harming Iran.

The trial comes at a time of heightened tension between Iran and the United States, which is leading efforts to tighten sanctions on Tehran because of its controversial nuclear program.

U.S. State Department spokesman Mark Toner last week urged Tehran to release Hekmati immediately.

He said that Switzerland, which represents U.S. interests in Iran in the absence of formal diplomatic ties, had formally requested permission for consular access to Hekmati on December 24 but Iran had refused.

"America's request for the return of the accused, indicates their utmost impudence and he should be tried based on the country's laws," justice ministry spokesman Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei said.

Iran said in May it had arrested 30 people on suspicion of spying for the United States, and 15 people were later indicted for spying for Washington and Israel.

(Writing by Mitra Amiri; Editing by Ben Harding)


View the original article here

Exxon Could Receive $555 Million in Cash from Venezuela

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

The arbitration award decided by the International Court of Arbitration, which is based in Paris, was valued at $907.6 million. In addition to the cash Exxon stands to receive, the oil giant will be released from the payment of debts totaling about $352 million. The ruling was dated Dec. 23, but Exxon said it did not receive the decision until Friday.

The Venezuelan government and Exxon both sought to portray themselves as victors in the arbitration, which stemmed from the 2007 nationalization of a heavy crude oil production project in the Orinoco Belt, considered one of the world’s richest potential petroleum reserves.

Petróleos de Venezuela, the state-run oil company, released a statement on Monday saying that Exxon had sought a much larger compensation and that the arbitrator’s conclusion showed that the company’s claims were “exorbitant” and “completely exaggerated and beyond all logic.”

The state oil company said that its “successful defense” in the case meant that it was required to make only a $255 million payment to Exxon.

But the state oil company’s statement acknowledged that Exxon would also receive about $300 million in cash from bank accounts in the United States belonging to the state oil company; those accounts were frozen by a court ruling after the nationalization. Exxon said the frozen accounts contained $305 million.

The government statement said that Venezuela has always been willing to compensate private interests for the nationalization of assets as long as the compensation was “fair and reasonable.”

In a statement Monday, Exxon said that the arbitration affirmed the state oil company’s contractual liability in its agreements with Exxon over what was known as the Cerro Negro project.

“Contract sanctity and respect for the rule of law are core principles used to manage our business over the long term,” Exxon said.

The nationalization of the Exxon project and other oil projects involving multinational corporations was a major step in a campaign of expropriations by the government of Venezuela’s president, Hugo Chávez.

Exxon and Venezuela are involved in a second arbitration over the same project before the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes, part of the World Bank, which could increase the amount the company receives.

The country faces several other potential settlements with foreign companies over a spate of nationalizations that have taken place in recent years. One of those involves a project of the oil company Conoco Phillips, also in the Orinoco Belt.

The ruling appeared to lend weight to Venezuela’s argument that it should compensate companies for the amount they had invested, the so-called book value, rather than the market value that an asset would receive if it were put up for sale.


View the original article here

Opposition Protests New Hungarian Constitution

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

The protest — a day after the country’s new “majoritarian” Constitution took effect — was the first time that opposition groups, from political parties to civil organizations, joined forces to rally against the new Constitution, which was drawn up and ratified by Mr. Orban’s Fidesz party in defiance of criticism from Europe and the United States.

Fidesz used its two-thirds supermajority in Parliament to adopt the Constitution, which critics say tightens the government’s grip on the news media and the courts and dismantles democratic aspects of the judiciary. Last month, the government passed a measure that critics said seriously weakened the independence of the nation’s central bank.

While various organizations have staged protests over the past year, Monday’s rally was a previously unseen show of unity by various opposition parties and civil groups, and timed to coincide with the extravagant gala organized by Fidesz to celebrate the signing of the Constitution. Thousands of disgruntled Hungarians poured into Budapest’s Andrássy Street, which is lined with luxury shops leading down from the opera house.

“Democracy has disappeared in Hungary — they even took the republic from us,” said Tamas Kollar, 56, referring to his nation’s name change, from the Republic of Hungary to simply Hungary. Mr. Kollar said he felt robbed of his rights under Mr. Orban’s government.

Organizers addressing the crowd estimated that tens of thousands had turned out to fill the square outside the ornate National Opera, in the heart of the city. Riot police officers had secured the area and moved into the crowd after scuffling broke out among protesters and members of the far right, identified by the red and white flags they carried, who then dispersed.

The far-right Jobbik party said in a statement that it would not participate in the protest, but called its supporters to a parallel demonstration nearby, leading to fears of clashes reminiscent of 2006 riots over demands that Ferenc Gyurcsany, then the prime minister, step down.

Since then, Hungarians have seemed reluctant to take to the streets. Although protests took place throughout 2011, they were relatively small. Monday’s turnout fed opposition hopes that a sizable crowd could send a clear message to the government.

Petr Konya of the Hungarian Solidarity Movement, which helped organize the demonstrations, told the cheering crowd that 2012 would be a year of hope.

“We want the rule of law back and we want the republic back,” Mr. Konya said, to loud cheers. “Viktor Orban forgot that the power belongs to the people, it belongs to us, and we will get it back from them.”

Mr. Orban and his supporters insist that the changes to the Constitution and other laws are only steps that make good on campaign promises to do away with the old order and complete the transition from Communism that had stalled under previous governments.

Palko Karasz reported from Budapest, and Melissa Eddy from Berlin.


View the original article here

Yaffa Yarkoni, 86, Who Sang for Israeli Wartime Troops, Is Dead

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Ms. Yarkoni died of pneumonia after a years-long struggle with Alzheimer’s disease, her daughter Ruth Yarkoni-Suissa told Israel’s Army Radio.

Ms. Yarkoni’s career largely echoed Israel’s own history, and she became a symbol of the generation that built the state, her classic ballads harking back to a time Israelis remember as more heroic and less complicated.

One of her most beloved songs, “Bab el Wad,” is an ode to the Israeli fighters who died in ambushes while driving convoys to Jerusalem during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. The lyrics were written by Haim Gouri, who later became one of Israel’s national poets.

Yitzhak Rabin, who went on to become prime minister, commanded the brigade that captured the area where the ambushes occurred. In a television interview shortly before his assassination in 1995, Mr. Rabin said “Bab el Wad” was one of his favorite songs.

That and other vintage songs sung by Ms. Yarkoni became anthems of Israeli memorial days.

Though she was renowned for performing for the troops on the front lines, Ms. Yarkoni told interviewers in her later years that she did not like being known as “the songstress of the wars” — and that she was hurt by critics who said she had built a career on the back of military conflict.

In 2002, she caused an uproar at the height of Israel’s military offensive in the West Bank meant to quell the violent second Palestinian uprising. She criticized the military and expressed empathy for the Palestinians, telling Army Radio: “We are a nation that went through the Holocaust. How can we do things like this to another nation?” She described Israel as “leaderless.”

Coming after months of Palestinian suicide bombings in Israeli cities, her comments touched a nerve in Israeli society, which is particularly sensitive to any comparisons made between its actions and those of Nazi Germany.

Ms. Yarkoni was branded a traitor by some. An organization of Israeli patriots canceled a gala concert that had been planned in her honor.

Still, Ms. Yarkoni’s death prompted an outpouring of popular affection.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement that her songs “were the soundtrack of Israel from its pre-state days, through the establishment of the state until our time.” President Shimon Peres said that while the Israeli military “conquered enemy positions, she conquered the hearts of the soldiers.” He called her the “nightingale” of the army and the entire nation.

Yaffa Abramov was born on Dec. 25, 1925, in Tel Aviv, to parents who had immigrated from the Caucasus. She began performing as a child with her siblings in a cafe run by their mother that became popular with artists.

She joined a local ballet company and married in 1944. Her husband, Joseph Gustin, joined the Jewish Brigade of the British Army and was killed in action in Italy in 1945, shortly before the end of World War II.

In 1948, she married Shaike Yarkoni, and together they had three daughters, Orit, Tamar and Ruth. Mr. Yarkoni died in 1983. Ms. Yarkoni is survived by her daughters, eight grandchildren and eight great-grandchildren.

She initially served as a wireless operator during the 1948 war, but soon joined an army entertainment unit.

As her career progressed, Ms. Yarkoni moved from singing mostly nationalistic songs to ballroom dance music, being a fan of swing, jazz and blues.

She was surprised and upset by the furor over her Army Radio interview in 2002. “How can anybody call me a villain?” Ms. Yarkoni said in an interview at the time with the Yediot Aharonot newspaper. She added, “Every time I see an Israeli flag, I cry.”


View the original article here

Kiro Gligorov, Macedonia President in 1990s, Dies at 94

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

His death was confirmed by an aide, Zivko Kondev.

Mr. Gligorov became president of Macedonia in January 1991 when it was still a Yugoslav republic. He led his countrymen through a referendum in which they voted for independence, and the territory of 2.1 million people became the only republic to secede from Yugoslavia without a war. He served two consecutive terms, leaving office in November 1999.

Severely injured in an assassination attempt in October 1995, Mr. Gligorov emerged from a roughly four-month hospital stay with deep facial scars. A bomb, which targeted his car as he headed to work in the capital, Skopje, cost him an eye and killed his driver and a bystander. No suspects were ever arrested.

The early days of Mr. Gligorov’s presidency were overshadowed by a bitter dispute with Greece over the newly independent nation’s name — a dispute that continues to this day.

Greece objected to the use of the name Macedonia, saying it implied territorial ambitions on its own northern province of the same name. It also objected to a symbol on the new country’s flag and articles of the Macedonian Constitution that Greece believed suggested territorial claims.

Greece imposed a crippling 19-month embargo on its northern neighbor. In 1995, the Macedonian government signed an accord with Greece agreeing to remove the symbol from its flag and revising some articles of the Constitution, but talks on the country’s name have made little progress. In official bodies such as the United Nations, the country is known as the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

Mr. Gligorov also faced domestic unrest, with the country’s large ethnic Albanian minority pressing for greater cultural and political autonomy.

The demands eventually boiled over into armed conflict in early 2001, about a year and a half after Mr. Gligorov left office. The two sides eventually signed a peace accord under which minorities were guaranteed greater rights, and NATO peacekeepers were sent to the country.

Born in the central Macedonian town of Stip on May 3, 1917, Mr. Gligorov graduated from law school in Belgrade and was working as a lawyer for a private bank in Skopje when World War II broke out. He joined the partisan movement fighting against the Nazi occupation from its early days.

He is survived by two daughters and a son. His wife, Nada, died in 2009.


View the original article here

China Set to Punish Another Human Rights Activist

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Freed from prison in 2010 but unable to walk, she ended up living in a Beijing park with her husband for nearly two months, until unflattering publicity led local officials to move them into a cheap hotel.

Their predicament will most likely take a turn for the worse in the coming weeks, when a court in the capital’s Xicheng district is expected to sentence the couple on charges that include “picking quarrels” and disturbing public order. “I’m afraid the sentence this time will be especially heavy,” their lawyer, Cheng Hai, said after their hearing on Thursday.

The trial of Ms. Ni and her husband, Dong Jiqin, capped a particularly grim year for Chinese dissidents and human rights advocates. In recent weeks, two veteran activists, Chen Wei and Chen Xi, have been given long sentences for essays criticizing the ruling Communist Party. Late last month, the authorities announced that Gao Zhisheng, a prominent rights lawyer, would have to spend an additional three years in prison for violating the terms of his probation.

Unaddressed in the terse official statement was how Mr. Gao, who had spent the previous 20 months in the custody of public security agents, had broken the law.

Although the government has long restricted the work and words of opponents, its tolerance has diminished further since February, when unrest in the Arab world unnerved senior leaders. Dozens of rights lawyers and intellectuals have been detained, countless others have been subjected to heightened police surveillance, and propaganda officials have sought to tighten controls on the Internet.

The artist and critic Ai Weiwei, who disappeared for more than two months, is still battling tax-evasion charges, an accusation he says is designed to silence him.

“The government seems to be going in only one direction, which is more control and harsher punishment against political dissidents,” said Nicholas Bequelin, a senior researcher at Human Rights Watch. “This is a reflection of the broader atmosphere in China, which is more conservative and hard-line.”

Mr. Bequelin and other analysts say they suspect the space for dissent will only narrow in 2012. There is the coming change in leadership, a transition that takes place once every decade, as well as the specter of an economic slowdown that party leaders worry could exacerbate social tensions.

Prognosticating in China is always a risky endeavor, but there are signs that the Communist Party is seeking to sharpen the tools it uses to quash dissent. A proposed revision to the criminal code would allow the police to secretly detain for six months those accused of “endangering national security,” a catchall designation often wielded against political offenders.

Jerome A. Cohen, a professor at New York University School of Law and an expert on Chinese law, called the revision “sinister” and said it would unduly strengthen the hand of the police. “It legalizes repressive and abusive state tactics,” Professor Cohen said.

The case of Ms. Ni and Mr. Dong highlights the ways officials can leverage the legal system against those they deem to be nuisances. Ms. Ni, 51, who received a law degree from China University of Political Science and Law, drew the attention of the authorities in 2002, when she used her expertise to help neighbors in Xicheng fighting eviction, part of the government’s sweeping effort to remake the capital ahead of the Olympics.

Detained after she tried to photograph demolition crews, she said she was kicked and pummeled over the course of 15 hours, leaving her incontinent and unable to walk. She was released after 75 days but continued her legal work while also seeking redress for the beating. Over the next few years, she was arrested twice more and convicted of “obstructing public business.”

During her three years in prison, she said, she endured frequent indignities: An officer once urinated on her face, she said, and prison officials often took away her crutches, forcing her to crawl from her cell to the prison workshop. One of her tasks included cleaning toilets.

Her daughter, too, said she was subjected to government surveillance. “The police followed me to school and watched me all day so I would experience the fear,” said the daughter, Dong Xuan, now 27.


View the original article here

India Ink: Image of the Day: January 3

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
This report on India from the journalists of The New York Times and a pool of talented writers in India and beyond provides unbiased, authoritative reporting on the country and its place in the world. India Ink also strives to be a virtual meeting point for discussion of this complex, fast-changing democracy – its politics, economy, culture and everyday life.


View the original article here

Friday, January 6, 2012

Piñera Defends Response to Chile Wildfires

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

The wildfires are believed to have begun in the majestic Torres del Paine National Park last Tuesday, and they broke out in other areas over the weekend. An elderly man who refused to leave one area was the only reported death, but altogether 90 square miles of forest have been destroyed, some 100 homes burned, hundreds of people evacuated, and a plywood plant owned by Arauco, a major lumber producer, ruined.

Still, the fires remain less destructive than some blazes in other countries. For instance, Australia’s bushfires of 2009 claimed more than 170 lives.

The government of Mr. Pi?era rejected accusations that it was slow in responding. Protests demanding changes in transportation, energy and above all education have driven his approval ratings down to 23 percent, the lowest for any Chilean leader since Gen. Augusto Pinochet’s dictatorship ended in 1990.

Mr. Pi?era said a red alert was declared just two hours after the Torres del Paine fire started on Dec. 27, and measures were quickly taken to combat the blaze. Still, Mr. Pi?era said the fire began in a zone of “very difficult access, with very difficult topography and additionally with conditions of intense winds.”

Neighboring Argentina and Uruguay have contributed to a force of more than 750 firefighters deployed in the country’s south, and Mr. Pi?era said that Chile had the helicopters and aircraft it needed to fight the blazes.

So far, the fires have burned more than 7 percent of Torres del Paine, a tourism draw known for its soaring granite peaks, and areas of two other regions, Bio Bio and Maule. Mr. Pi?era said four of six focal areas in Torres del Paine were coming under control, and that the park could partially reopen by Wednesday.

Fires have whipped through Torres del Paine before. In 2005 a 31-year-old Czech tourist accidentally started a fire in the park that caused more than $5 million in damage. The government of the Czech Republic subsequently issued a letter of apology and offered to send forestry experts to assist in the recuperation.

In the latest fires, an Israeli tourist, Rotem Singer, 23, has been arrested and charged with starting the park blaze. By the account of a prosecutor, Ivan Vidal, people traveling with Mr. Singer said he set fire to toilet paper after going to the bathroom, and then failed to put it out completely. But he strongly denied the accusation, saying his translator may have contributed to misunderstandings.

Yediot Aharonot, a leading Israeli newspaper, said it interviewed Mr. Singer by telephone. It quoted him as saying: “I did not cause the blaze. I have been framed and turned into a scapegoat.”

The newspaper said Mr. Singer was met at court with angry shouts and anti-Semitic curses like “stinking Jew.” He said he feared for his safety. Mr. Singer denied that he had confessed to anything. “I am not guilty of anything, and I don’t know how this story landed on me,” he said.

The Israeli Embassy in Chile said in a statement Monday that it would not take part in the “judicial procedure” involving Mr. Singer. “We understand his family will hire an attorney for his defense,” the embassy said. In the statement, the embassy added that it shared Chileans’ “distress over the environmental damage in Torres del Paine.”

The embassy “trusts the Chilean authorities will determine the circumstances in which it was produced,” the statement said.

Simon Romero reported from Rio de Janeiro, and Pascale Bonnefoy from Santiago, Chile. Isabel Kershner contributed reporting from Jerusalem.


View the original article here

Pakistani Panel Begins Inquiry Into Memo

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

ISLAMABAD — A three-member Supreme Court panel opened an inquiry on Monday into a controversial memo suggestive of a civilian-military power struggle, seeking statements from the Pakistani spy chief and Pakistan’s recently resigned ambassador to United States, as well as a former American national security adviser, before adjourning to Jan. 9.

Metro Twitter Logo.Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.

The panel also asked the attorney general to approach the Canadian company Research In Motion to obtain the record of BlackBerry messages between the former Pakistani ambassador, Husain Haqqani, and an American businessman of Pakistani origins, Mansoor Ijaz, who brought the memo to light.

The memo was purported to be from the Pakistani government, and asked for help in warding off a coup by the military in the wake of its humiliation by the American operation that killed Osama bin Laden, promising in exchange to alter parts of the country’s spy agency. Mr. Ijaz said in October that he was asked to convey the memo to Adm. Mike Mullen, who was then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Eventually, he identified Mr. Haqqani as being behind the memo.

Mr. Haqqani has denied having anything to do with the memo. James L. Jones, a retired Marine Corps commandant and former national security adviser who delivered the memo to Admiral Mullen, said in a statement last month that he had no reason to believe that Mr. Haqqani had any role in its creation.


View the original article here

U.S. Military Deaths in Afghanistan

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
An Innocent in America Room for Debate: Are Teachers Overpaid? China Set to Punish Human Rights Activist A Renewed Optimism for Deals On Wall Street Competing histories across the Strait of Gibraltar contribute to its peculiar exclaves.

‘Glee’ Star Gets His Broadway Turn Medicare should demand evidence that a costly cancer treatment is more effective than cheaper options.

In Nigeria, designating Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist group will only inflame anti-Americanism among Muslims.


View the original article here

World Briefing | Asia: Kashmir: Protesters Fired On

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
An Innocent in America Room for Debate: Are Teachers Overpaid? China Set to Punish Human Rights Activist A Renewed Optimism for Deals On Wall Street Competing histories across the Strait of Gibraltar contribute to its peculiar exclaves.

‘Glee’ Star Gets His Broadway Turn Medicare should demand evidence that a costly cancer treatment is more effective than cheaper options.

In Nigeria, designating Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist group will only inflame anti-Americanism among Muslims.


View the original article here

At War Blog: Lens: From a Marine's Side of the Camera

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Over on the Lens blog, Sgt. Thomas James Brennan writes about the close bonds that form during battle, even between soldiers and the combat photographers documenting them. When Finbarr O’Reilly, a Reuters photographer, embedded with Sgt. Brennan’s squad of Marines in Afghanistan last October, he was a little guarded around the man with the camera. But the war didn’t give him time or space to hold onto those feelings. And conversations with Mr. O’Reilly, coupled with the closeness of battle, forged a bond between the men that continues to today. A bond was cemented with the commonalities the men shared, as Sgt. Brennan notes:

We mesh because we are so different, yet in so many ways alike, because we are not the status quo. We aren’t normal 9-to-5rs. Our 9 a.m. would start at 0600 hours and when our 5 p.m. would come, at 2100, we would tell stories of home or debate current events. Whether we shared the same ideals at that moment didn’t matter. The conversation was simply an escape from the harrowing reality we were in; a reality that few people share, a reality that brought Finbarr and me together.

Read the blog post here.


View the original article here

China’s President Pushes Back Against Western Culture

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Mr. Hu’s words signaled that a major policy initiative announced last October would continue well into 2012.

The essay, which was signed by Mr. Hu and based on a speech he gave in October, drew a sharp line between the cultures of the West and China and effectively said the two sides were engaged in an escalating culture war. It was published in Seeking Truth, a magazine founded by Mao Zedong as a platform for establishing Communist Party principles.

“We must clearly see that international hostile forces are intensifying the strategic plot of westernizing and dividing China, and ideological and cultural fields are the focal areas of their long-term infiltration,” Mr. Hu said, according to a translation by Reuters.

“We should deeply understand the seriousness and complexity of the ideological struggle, always sound the alarms and remain vigilant and take forceful measures to be on guard and respond,” he added.

Those measures, Mr. Hu said, should be centered on developing cultural products that can draw the interest of the Chinese and meet the “growing spiritual and cultural demands of the people.”

Chinese leaders have long lamented the fact that Western expressions of popular culture and art seem to overshadow those from China. The top grossing films in China have been “Avatar” and “Transformers 3,” and the music of Lady Gaga is as popular here as that of any that of any Chinese pop singer. In October, at the annual plenum of the party’s Central Committee, where Mr. Hu gave his speech, officials discussed the need for bolstering the “cultural security” of China.

“The overall strength of Chinese culture and its international influence is not commensurate with China’s international status,” Mr. Hu said in his essay, according to another translation.

“The international culture of the West is strong while we are weak,” he said.

Mr. Hu did not address the widespread assertion by Chinese artists and intellectuals that state censorship is what prevents artists and their works from reaching their full potential. Last week, Han Han, a novelist and China’s most popular blogger, discussed the issue in an online essay called “On Freedom.”

“The restriction on cultural activities makes it impossible for China to influence literature and cinema on a global basis or for us culturati to raise our heads up proud,” Han Han wrote.

The publication of Mr. Hu’s essay and other articles in Seeking Truth on bolstering China’s cultural power signaled that this would be a central initiative in 2012, which is a transition year for the Chinese leadership as seven of the top nine party members step down from the Standing Committee of the Politburo. Mr. Hu appeared keen to enshrine the culture drive as a final defining moment of his decade-long tenure at China’s helm.

The Central Committee meeting in October established the ideological foundation for a tightening of a cultural sphere that is only now beginning to unfold. Right after the meeting, officials announced a sweeping new policy to wipe scores of so-called entertainment shows off the air. That took effect on Sunday. Television stations have been racing to come up with new programs that will be deemed “socially responsible” by the censors.

Last month, officials in Beijing and other cities ordered Internet companies to ensure that people posting on microblogs, called Sina Weibo in Chinese, had registered their accounts using their real names, though they could still post under an alias. Officials have been putting pressure on executives and editors running the microblog platforms to self-censor, and many microblog users say the microblogs have been getting less interesting.

At the same time, China has been making a push to increase its cultural influence abroad, or its “soft power.” The government has opened up Confucius Institutes around the world to aid foreigners in learning Chinese. The state is also lavishing financing on opening operations of large state-run news organizations, including Xinhua, the state news agency, and China Central Television in cities around the world. Officials from those organizations say they hope their version of the world events becomes as common as those from Western news organizations.


View the original article here

Letter From Europe: London's Fog of Olympic Ambivalence

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Both visions of London’s Olympic destiny are true, if unprovable, depending on which cab driver, barroom pundit, holder of tickets for the 100 meters final or failed bidder for those same prized items is expounding on the issue.

If sporting spectaculars mirror the societies that stage them — the regimented opening ceremony of the 2008 Games in Beijing, for instance — then Britain’s first Olympics since 1948 suggests ambivalence: for every muscle-toned, would-be champion, London offers a counterview, a curmudgeon voice to confound the organizers’ attempts to create a myth of undiluted enthusiasm and public support.

The Games, said Sebastian Coe, an Olympic gold medalist and the head of the organizing committee, will be “the biggest thing this nation will have delivered in the living memory of the vast majority of the population” — bigger, thus, than the Falklands war or the Northern Ireland peace, a supporting role in the invasion of Iraq, a lingering commitment in Afghanistan, the boom-to-bust banking crisis, the X-Factor or sundry royal weddings, funerals and divorces.

Stretch the notion of living memory to encompass the witness that binds one generation’s memory to the next, and a few weeks of sporting bonanza will eclipse the D-Day landings or the dismantling of most of the British Empire.

But hype is part of the Olympic run-up, the boosterism discernible already in parts of the British media, cementing the new orthodoxy that holds support for the Games to be laudably British, and indifference to be a poor show, even unpatriotic.

“We’ve got all the stuff in place,” Lord Coe said, likening the Games to Halley’s Comet “which doesn’t come around that often” (every four years for the Games; 75 or so for the comet.) “But people will decide how they respond, and my judgment is that they’re responding in a massive way now.”

Massive, perhaps, in the sense described by Robert Hardman, a journalist and author, in The Daily Mail: “We have been treated like imbeciles by those who believe they have a divine right to squander other people’s money in the name of sport.” Or by the design critic Stephen Bayley, quoted in The Guardian on the subject of the opening ceremony, who suggested that “Sebastian Coe and his army of bureaucrats should be dressed in penitential costumes and chained together, then made to parade slowly around the stadium in muted lighting chanting ‘Mea culpa, mea culpa.”’

Great sporting galas, of course, always offer a contest between democracy and tyranny, between the crowds and competitors in the stadiums, bonded by the passion of the moment, and those less in thrall to balls kicked, javelins lofted, hurdles leaped, batons passed or shots put.

To test the point, try navigating parts of West London when 82,000 rugby union fans are spilling out of Twickenham Stadium; or try crossing the city by road when highways are closed for the annual London Marathon.

Now multiply those tribulations by many degrees and imagine a capital city in July and August committed to the Olympics to the exclusion of its normal crop of tourists, theatergoers or conventioneers.

The West End theater district, said the composer and impresario Andrew Lloyd Webber, is facing “a bloodbath of a summer” because theatergoers can neither find nor afford hotel rooms in a city filled with sports fans. “People who want to go to the theater or concerts are not the same sort of people who really want to go to sport,” he said.

But duality has accompanied the London Games from their beginnings.

For every announcement of stadiums built or rail links upgraded, there have been reports of cost overruns.

London secured the right to host the Games at a time of economic boom when the nation seemed afloat on surging credit. Now, the city is obliged to stage them after the bust of the global economic crisis when jobs are lost and times are hard.

“You can say: These are times of austerity, and therefore we should pare them down as much as possible,” said Jeremy Hunt, the British culture secretary. “Or, you can say: Because these are times of austerity, we need to do everything we possibly can to harness the opportunity of the Olympics.”

Britain has chosen the latter course. That is not really surprising: official enthusiasm has rarely seemed to wane or falter.

On July 6, 2005, when the International Olympic Committee awarded the 2012 event to London, Prime Minister Tony Blair declared, “It’s not often in this job that you punch the air and do a little dance and embrace the person next to you.”

Less than 24 hours later — by apparent coincidence — the hop-skip-and-jump fizzled when four homegrown suicide bombers killed 52 travelers next to them on the London transport network, confronting Britons with the unsettling notion that their land had spawned a nexus of Islamic terrorists bent on mayhem.

The authorities spent successive years confronting waves of conspiracies, including the foiled plot in 2006 to bomb at least seven airliners over the Atlantic.

That accomplishment by the security agencies, too, might have fallen within Mr. Coe’s pantheon of achievement delivered in Britain’s living memory.

And it might help explain why, for all the exuberant anticipation, Britain plans to commit 13,000 troops in addition to the police to shield crowds and competitors, not just, presumably, from the curmudgeons, but also from those of far more sinister intent.


View the original article here

Ismail Haniya of Gaza Visits Turkey

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Here in Turkey, where Mr. Haniya arrived after visiting Egypt and Sudan, he was quoted by the semiofficial Anatolian Agency on Monday as saying that “the Arab Spring is turning into an Islamic spring.”

Turkey, ruled by the Islamic-based Justice and Development Party, has grown close to Hamas and has downgraded its relations with Israel. In 2010, a group of ships and boats sailed from Turkey in an effort to break the Israeli naval blockade of Gaza, and Israeli commandos boarded the vessels to stop them. When they met with resistance, the commandos killed nine activists on board. Turkey has demanded an apology and compensation; Israel has refused.

Mr. Haniya visited the Mavi Marmara, the largest ship of the flotilla, on Monday and said, “The blood of Mavi Marmara martyrs and that of Palestinian martyrs is joined for a hopeful future.”

While Mr. Haniya tours the region seeking financial and political support — he is heading to Iran, a major backer, in the coming days, according to the semiofficial Iranian news agency FARS — his rivals in the Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority were due to meet with Israeli officials on Tuesday for the first time in 15 months.

The meeting, organized in Amman, the Jordanian capital, by King Abdullah II of Jordan, is viewed as an effort to revive peace negotiations aimed at establishing a Palestinian state, but both Palestinian and Israeli officials were keeping expectations for the meeting low. Hamas opposes negotiations with Israel as a waste of time, and it urged the Palestinian Authority not to attend.

By calling the meeting, King Abdullah is, in part, seeking to parry the rise of Islamism, especially that of Hamas within the Palestinian movement. Though Israeli officials want to help him in that task, it was not clear whether they would arrive in Jordan with proposals that could lure the Palestinians back into direct talks.

Hamas has long maintained its political headquarters in Syria, where an uprising against President Bashar al-Assad has shaken the country for nearly a year. Mr. Haniya declined Monday to comment on the situation in Syria, or to directly address numerous reports that the group is seeking another base.

“The Hamas leadership currently lives in Damascus,” Mr. Haniya said on NTV, a private television news channel, declining to elaborate on a possible move. “Everything, however, remains open to discussion.”

In a meeting with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey on Sunday, Mr. Haniya thanked him for Turkey’s continuing support for the lifting of the Israeli embargo on Gaza, and he briefed senior Turkish officials on civilian hardships in Gaza. Mr. Haniya also praised Turkey’s acceptance of 11 Palestinians, former prisoners who were released last year as part of the exchange that led to release of the Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

Omer Celik, a senior party official in Turkey, called the Gaza conflict Turkey’s “national issue” and urged Israel to recognize Hamas as a legitimate political organization; Israel, the United States and European nations regard it as a terrorist group.

“If Israel is sincere about the peace process,” Mr. Celik said on NTV, standing next to Mr. Haniya, “it should quit declaring organizations like Hamas that support the peace process illegal, and stop building settlements.”

Turkey backs Egyptian-led reconciliation efforts between Hamas and Fatah that began in May but are moving slowly. Israel says that if Hamas joins the Palestinian Authority, there can be no peace talks. At the moment, Mahmoud Abbas, president of the Palestinian Authority and head of Fatah, is caught between reconciling with Israel and reconciling with Hamas.

Mr. Haniya’s tour is expected to take him to Qatar, Tunisia and Bahrain in addition to Iran.

Sebnem Arsu reported from Istanbul and Ethan Bronner from Jerusalem.


View the original article here

Jail Term for Daughter of Iranian Ex-President

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
An Innocent in America Room for Debate: Are Teachers Overpaid? China Set to Punish Human Rights Activist A Renewed Optimism for Deals On Wall Street Competing histories across the Strait of Gibraltar contribute to its peculiar exclaves.

‘Glee’ Star Gets His Broadway Turn Medicare should demand evidence that a costly cancer treatment is more effective than cheaper options.

In Nigeria, designating Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist group will only inflame anti-Americanism among Muslims.


View the original article here

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Bob Anderson, Sword-Fight Choreographer, Dies at 89

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Philip Bruce, president of the British Academy of Fencing, confirmed the death.

Mr. Anderson was a superior and versatile athlete who as a sailor in the Royal Marines in the 1940s won interservice fencing championships with all three of the sport’s weapons — foil, épée and saber. Saber, a flat-bladed weapon with which points are scored by striking with the side of the blade, was his specialty. (In foil and épée only the tip of the swords are used to score.) Mr. Anderson represented Great Britain at the 1952 Helsinki Olympics and twice in the world championships in the saber competition.

Just before the Olympics, Mr. Anderson was asked to be a fight choreographer and stunt double for the film “Master of Ballantrae,” an adaptation of Robert Louis Stevenson’s swashbuckling tale of an 18th-century Scottish lord who takes up piracy, Mr. Anderson and the film’s star, Errol Flynn, became great pals in spite of a mishap during which, as the two men were being filmed in a sword fight, Flynn was wounded in the thigh. Flynn immediately took responsibility for the accident, though Mr. Anderson was thereafter known as the man who stabbed Errol Flynn.

Over the next several decades Mr. Anderson became well-known in Hollywood as a sword master — part instructor, part stuntman, part fight choreographer. With a reputation as a perfectionist, he earned the nickname “Grumpy Bob.”

Among many other projects, he worked with James Bond (a k a Sean Connery) on “From Russia with Love” (1963); with Ryan O’Neal in Stanley Kubrick’s picaresque 19th-century drama based on a novel by Thackeray, “Barry Lyndon” (1975); with Cary Elwes and Mandy Patinkin, who played ambidextrous combatants in “The Princess Bride” (1987); with Aramis, Athos, Porthos and D’Artagnan (Charlie Sheen, Kiefer Sutherland, Oliver Platt and Chris O’Donnell) in “The Three Musketeers” (1993); with Antonio Banderas and Catherine Zeta-Jones in “The Mask of Zorro” (1998) and “The Legend of Zorro” (2005); and with the director Peter Jackson on the epic Medieval fantasy “The Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring” (2001).

Most famously, Mr. Anderson worked on George Lucas’s original “Star Wars” trilogy. He played a behind-the-scenes role in the first film, “Star Wars” (1977), but in the next two, “The Empire Strikes Back” (1980) and “The Return of the Jedi” (1983), he appeared on-screen as the evil, black-helmeted Darth Vader in the scenes in which he battles the young hero, Luke, who is secretly his son, with sabers whose blades are laserlike lights.

He was uncredited in the part; the role was voiced by James Earl Jones and played by David Prowse, a hulking actor, 6 feet 7 inches tall, who was simply not good with a saber. Mr. Anderson stepped in, and though he was six inches shorter than Mr. Prowse, his identity was a secret until Mark Hamill disclosed it in an interview.

“I finally told George I didn’t think it was fair any more,” Mr. Hamill told Starlog, a science fiction magazine. “Bob worked so bloody hard that he deserves some recognition.” Robert James Gilbert Anderson was born on Sept. 15, 1922, in Hampshire, England, southwest of London. Survivors include his wife, Pearl, three children and several grandchildren.

In addition to his film work, Mr. Anderson was for many years the coach of Great Britain’s national fencing team, and he was also, in the 1960s and 1970s, president of the British Academy of Fencing, which oversees the training of fencing coaches in the United Kingdom. A statement by the academy on Monday said, in part: “It is true to say that nearly 100 percent of fencing in Britain today is directly or indirectly attributable to the work of this man.”


View the original article here

At War Blog: In Common

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Lance Cpl. Benjamin Whetstone Schmidt was killed in Afghanistan on Oct. 6. He was a 24-year-old native of San Antonio, a Marine scout sniper and a son of proud parents. Like many others, Corporal Schmidt volunteered for the combat tour that cost him his life because, as he explained to his friends and family, he wanted to go back to protect his fellow Marines.

Even before it emerged that he had been killed by friendly fire, his explanation had struck me because my son Ricky had given the same reason for extending his commitment in order to make his last deployment, though luckily for us it ended well. At the time, I had told him that he had done quite enough and that maybe it was time to leave the Marines and to go back to college. But he said he? had to go talk to the “Afghanistan dude:” the gunnery sergeant who would explain his options.

A few days later, as that discussion was related to me, Ricky, who had already served four years, was told he was free to leave the Marines — if he was comfortable with letting the younger guys he had helped train go into battle without having him there to guide and protect them. And, of course, that sealed it. I had warned him that the “dude” would be better skilled in the art of persuasive guilt than any grandmother or Catholic school nun ever could be, but I knew my words would have no more weight than the breath that conveyed them.

My son never met Corporal Schmidt, but they were not exactly strangers. The corporal’s father, Dr. David Schmidt, is well known in San Antonio as the team physician for the Spurs of the National Basketball Association. But, in a much less publicized role, he is also the team physician for the Trinity University Tigers, the Division III football team that my son joined when he returned home safely from Afghanistan and went to college.

In early September, Ricky had injured his shoulder in practice and was being treated by Dr. Schmidt. During office visits, they talked about football, the Marines, Afghanistan and, of course, Dr. Schmidt’s son. Corporal Schmidt had spent three semesters at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth before enlisting, just as Ricky had spent a year at the University of Connecticut. Benjamin Schmidt felt he was not ready for school and needed to distinguish himself in some other way before finishing his education; Ricky had felt the same way two years before.

Corporal Schmidt had also been a football player at Alamo Heights High School, a school that my daughter had attended before she also went to T.C.U. Dr. Schmidt described his son as handsome, complex and thoughtful, and very funny. But the words that would come to haunt Ricky were his own, when he told Dr. Schmidt just weeks before the scheduled end of his son’s deployment that he should not worry, adding that “Lance Corporal Schmidt will be O.K.”

On Oct. 7, Ricky called me, distraught on hearing the news of Corporal Schmidt’s death, and asked, “What can I ever say to Dr. Schmidt now that he’s not O.K.?” I told him that his reassurance was not a promise broken but a comfort, and that he was not accountable for Dr. Schmidt’s loss. But Ricky could not let it go, Nor, I suppose, could Corporal Schmidt have done so had their fates been reversed, an almost imponderable situation that I have now considered too many times to count. These Marines, all of them, are forever part of an organization that instills an ingrained responsibility to protect one other as both its principal weapon and its shield. And so for this one Marine, now a college sophomore, even being at home a half a world away did not soften the sting of this tragedy.

He wrote to Dr. Schmidt that night:

I do not know what to tell you, Dr. Schmidt, I have no idea, the only thing I can think to say is what I would hope somebody tell my father if my time was up: You see, over there, life doesn’t seem the same, not for us, the wins and the losses are too surreal to really hit home. We talk about “home” we talk about everything that that word means, or we think it means to us, “Ah man when I get back…,” but they are just fantasies. They are distant, and they are strictly when you have literally nothing better to do. The only thing that matters out there is the present, the guys you are with, and the idea of something greater. I believe that your son is not much different than me in this regard, not even a little. Your son is a hero, a true hero. Many people, such as me, have the burden of coming back, and fading away, forgotten. Your son will never be lost this way, he will live forever. There are many good men alive today because of a great man; and their stories, legacies and lives are a gift from him. My deepest condolences sir.

This year, with the end of the Iraq war, coming home is a common thought among us all. Still, skeptics see it as a ploy, strategically set to occur at the beginning of a national election year. Others see it as a victory and a promise kept. But to the troops and the families, from Iraq and Afghanistan, coming home is all that is on their minds. Dr. and Mrs. Schmidt, I want you to know that your son Benjamin is also on mine.

This is the fourth post that Tom Cassone has contributed to At War. Read his other posts here. If you have a loved one serving overseas and would like to contribute an essay about your experience, please write to us at AtWar@nytimes.com


View the original article here

Violent Clashes Reported in China Over Mosque Demolition

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
An Innocent in America Room for Debate: Are Teachers Overpaid? China Set to Punish Human Rights Activist A Renewed Optimism for Deals On Wall Street Competing histories across the Strait of Gibraltar contribute to its peculiar exclaves.

‘Glee’ Star Gets His Broadway Turn Medicare should demand evidence that a costly cancer treatment is more effective than cheaper options.

In Nigeria, designating Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist group will only inflame anti-Americanism among Muslims.


View the original article here

Russian Art Group, Voina, Claims Attack on Police Van

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

MOSCOW — A spokesman for the radical art collective Voina on Monday announced that its members had broken into a St. Petersburg police station on New Year’s Eve and used gasoline bombs to incinerate a police vehicle used to transport prisoners as “a gift to all political prisoners of Russia.” Amateur video posted online showed a figure tossing lighted objects under a large vehicle, which was then engulfed in flames and spewed smoke into the night sky.

Metro Twitter Logo.Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.

The St. Petersburg police responded skeptically to the Voina claims, releasing a statement that described the fire damage to the vehicle as “insignificant” and noting that there were similar rumors of arson after a fire in August that forensics specialists determined had been caused by a short circuit.

Voina, which was founded by a Moscow philosophy student in 2005, won a contemporary art award sponsored by Russia’s Ministry of Culture for a 2010 work that consisted of a 210-foot penis painted on the roadway of a St. Petersburg drawbridge, which rose to point at the offices of the F.S.B., the state security service. Its members went on to a project they called “Palace Revolution,” in which teams of men ran up to parked police cars and flipped them over, in what they described as a protest against police corruption.

The group’s activities dropped off in 2010 after two of its leaders were arrested on serious hooliganism charges; both men were released last spring on bail, with the assistance of $20,000 donated by the British street artist known as Banksy. The charges, which could bring seven-year sentences, still stand. A third member has been in detention on vandalism charges since taking part in a protest on Dec. 6 and is on a hunger strike, Aleksei Plutser-Sarno, the group’s spokesman, said by e-mail.

All day, liberals bickered online over whether the arson attack on the police vehicle constituted “pure art,” as one commentator put it, or, as another maintained, “an act as idiotic as voting for United Russia,” the ruling party.

Andrei V. Yerofeyev, a prominent intellectual who has championed Voina in the past, said he thought that the group had helped awaken a more activist spirit in the Russian populace, and that it should move away from radical political acts like the burning of the police vehicle.

“The goal of art is deeper than activism,” he said. “They have carried out their assignment.”


View the original article here

The Lede Blog: Observers Confronted With Anger, Gunshots and a Dead Child in Syria

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Video posted online by Syrian activists appeared to show that gunfire continued in the city of Homs on Wednesday despite the presence of a delegation from the Arab League.

Updated | 8:26 p.m. On its second day of work in the Syrian city of Homs, a team of observers from the Arab League dodged bullets and was confronted by angry residents, who displayed the dead body of a child they said had been killed by government forces.

The observers, in orange jackets, were accompanied everywhere by activists wielding video cameras, who posted video online of the team’s being confronted with the body of the young boy.

The activists also uploaded extremely graphic and disturbing video of the observers’ photographing the wounds of the dead child, with another clip of the young boy’s body being placed on the hood of the monitors’ car.

As CNN reports, men in the video identify the young boy as Ahmed Mohammed al-Ra’i, and call him a “martyr.”

Although the Sudanese head of the mission, Lt. Gen. Mohamed al-Dabi, told Reuters after his team’s first day in Homs that the observers had seen “nothing frightening,” several video clips recorded by activists on Wednesday seemed to show them dodging gunfire as they toured the city with residents.

According to the activists who uploaded these two clips to an activist YouTube channel on Wednesday, this video was recorded as gunshots were fired at observers crossing a street in Homs.

Another clip, posted on the Sham News Network YouTube channel, appeared to show members of the delegation taking refuge from gunfire in a doorway, and then waving a white cloth as more shots were fired.

According to Shakeeb Al-Jabri, a Syrian activist in Beirut who writes as LeShaque on Twitter, this video shows Homs residents taking advantage of the monitors’ presence to “taunt” government soldiers at a checkpoint in the city.

After the crowd chanted, “Peaceful! Peaceful!” at the start of the clip, Mr. Jabri explained the protesters “chanted right in front of the army: ‘Traitors! Traitors! Traitors! The Syrian Army is a traitor!’” Later in the day, Mr. Jabri reported that activists in Homs said three of the people who spoke to the observers were arrested by the government.

Salman Shaikh, the director of the Brookings Doha Center, called the role played by citizen journalists in Homs, observing the observers, a “potential game-changer.”

After video of the observers praying was posted online, Mr. Jabri, the activist in Beirut, suggested that the monitors must be “thinking the entire city is an episode of ‘Big Brother.’”

Activists trailing the delegation with cameras also captured this video of a man identified by the blogger BSyria as a citizen journalist named Khaled Abu Salah showing the head of the delegation, General Dabi, a devastated street in Homs.

In another clip, Mr. Abu Salah was recorded explaining to the general that residents of Homs feel let down by the Arab League.

More video posted online by activists later in the day was said to show defectors from the Syrian army leading chants at a large rally in the city on Wednesday.

Late Wednesday, an activist who writes as Alexander Page reported on Twitter that one of the most active citizen journalists in Homs, Basil al Sayid, was killed while recording this video.

This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: December 28, 2011

An earlier version of this post misstated the name of an activist YouTube channel that hosted a clip in which members of the Arab League delegation appeared to take refuge from gunfire in a doorway. It is the Sham News Network channel, not Shams.


View the original article here

Conflicting Reports of Attack on Iraq’s Finance Minister, Rafe al-Essawi

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

But on Monday, no one seemed to be able to agree on any of the details of the attack against the official, Finance Minister Rafe al-Essawi, or even whether it had happened at all. Not for the first time, the facts seemed to be scrambled by Iraq’s growing political and sectarian discord.

Security forces from the Salahuddin Operations Command, which answers to the Shiite-led government in Baghdad, denied that there had been any attack in Salahuddin Province, a largely Sunni area that is home to a renowned Shiite shrine and includes Saddam Hussein’s hometown. A security official at the command said officials “didn’t witness any security breach.”

But two hours later, the local police in Salahuddin contradicted that account, and accused the operations command of “hiding” the incident.

Mr. Essawi himself was in no doubt. He said in a telephone interview that he and a few other Iraqi politicians were returning to Baghdad from a funeral when a blast slammed their convoy outside the holy city of Samarra. Mr. Essawi, who has been an outspoken critic of Iraq’s Shiite prime minister, said he did not know whether the bombing was an assassination attempt aimed specifically at him. But he quickly laid blame for the bombing on the government, which is struggling to keep a lid on terrorist attacks and politically motivated violence in the country.

“With such a violated security situation, it could happen to everyone,” Mr. Essawi said.

The contradictory accounts were reminiscent of late November, when news of a suicide car bombing just outside Iraq’s Parliament was swamped by competing narratives. Immediately after the blast, a spokesman for the Sunni speaker of Parliament, Osama al-Nujaifi, said the attack appeared to be an attempt to assassinate Mr. Nujaifi. A few days later, a security spokesman said on television that the true target was Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, a Shiite.

Within weeks of that disputed attack, a long-running feud between Mr. Maliki and his political opponents erupted into one of the country’s worst political crises in years, one that has exposed sectarian tensions and raised worries that Mr. Maliki was consolidating power against his rivals now that American military forces have withdrawn from Iraq.

The Sunni vice president has fled to the Kurdish north to avoid arrest on terrorism charges, and Mr. Maliki is trying to oust the deputy prime minister, another Sunni. Iraqiya, a political coalition with wide Sunni support, is boycotting Parliament, and so far Mr. Maliki and the Iraqiya bloc’s leaders have been unable to even agree to talk about the crisis.

Mr. Essawi, a former hospital director from Anbar Province in the western Sunni heartland, has been a central figure in the political furor. He has called for Mr. Maliki to be replaced and is refusing to attend meetings of Iraq’s cabinet — moves that have prompted the prime minister to try to push him aside.

On Monday, Mr. Nujaifi, another Iraqiya leader, made a televised speech warning of the deteriorating human rights picture in Iraq, marked by arbitrary arrests and abuses, and accused Mr. Maliki of using the security forces to advance his political interests.

An Iraqi employee of The New York Times contributed reporting from Samarra, Iraq.


View the original article here

As European Union Expands, Unanimity Breaks Down

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

But, as the union expands, the notion of universal consent is seen as increasingly unworkable and could be starting to break down. Legislators here are devising new approaches that will enable smaller groups of countries to adopt laws among themselves — without the threat of a veto if all 27 member nations fail to agree.

The move toward smaller groupings reflects a growing fragmentation of the European Union and has been developing for some time. But it took on added significance after a spectacular dispute at the European summit meeting in December, when Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain failed to achieve new safeguards from European Union laws for his nation’s financial-services sector. In retaliation, he blocked a proposed treaty change aimed at helping to strengthen the euro.

Under current rules, groups of at least nine nations may go ahead with legislation if an agreement has stalled. However, they can do so only after all 27 countries have been through the time-consuming process of trying and failing to agree. So far, that has happened in only two cases, but others in which this principle may apply are working their way slowly through the system.

Most prominent are two pieces of draft tax legislation that have been drawn up in a way that ensures that they could work without the cooperation of the British if necessary. Moreover, they seem intended to operate in a way that could prevent Britain from gaining a big competitive advantage from staying outside the plan and undercutting other nations that adopt it.

The most diplomatically fragile proposal involves a financial transaction tax, which has been proposed by the European Commission and could raise about $74 billion a year, starting in 2014. Under the plan, the tax would be levied at a rate of one-tenth of 1 percent on all transactions between institutions. Derivatives contracts would be taxed at the rate of one-hundredth of 1 percent.

French and German policy makers see this as a “Robin Hood tax,” a way of discouraging speculative transactions and raising cash from the bankers who provoked the financial crisis.

Financial analysts say that it was Britain’s concern over this impending legislation — and the potential damage it could do to its banking industry — that was at least partly responsible for its unyielding stance at the December meeting. British leaders feared that in the absence of global regulations, banks would simply relocate from London to New York, Singapore or other lower-tax domains. The British government points out that even a study by the European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union, suggests that the tax could reduce European gross domestic product by 1.76 percent.

Under the proposed legislation, a British veto would no longer prevent nine or more nations that wanted to go ahead from doing so. In principle, this would allow Britain to continue as a partial tax haven. But a clause in the law would require banks in the smaller group of nations to pay the tax on some transactions, even if they operate in London.

Similarly, moves to harmonize the base on which corporate taxes are assessed in Europe could work among a smaller number of nations even if Britain did not take part. Large corporations operating across borders would be able to opt for a unified tax system in the countries that sign up for the plan. That would simplify tax issues for companies operating in the participating nations and might even tempt some to relocate to them at the expense of Britain, which is likely to stay out.

“Obviously, these proposals are both on the table for 27 member states, and we would like to see them agreed by the 27,” said Emer Traynor, spokeswoman on taxation for the European Commission. “However, if that is not possible, these proposals are also workable if done by a smaller group. It is still completely feasible for a smaller group of member states to go ahead with them and deliver big benefits.”

Despite Britain’s December veto of the treaty change on the euro, no additional protection for financial services was secured by the British. Neither of the two tax plans has yet been discussed fully by the 27 member nations, and smaller groups of countries could not contemplate forging ahead unless they were rejected.

The new way of devising laws is not always aimed against Britain. The British have, in fact, joined one plan, which aims to build a European system for patent protection. But the shift in the way the union is legislating is significant because it changes the rules of the game.

Some European officials argue that Britain, which has long promoted the idea of a more variable model of European integration, with countries free to pick and choose the degree of cooperation, is now experiencing the downside. Laws are being drafted in the knowledge that Britain may not take part and so are intended to prevent it from reaping a competitive advantage by staying out.


View the original article here