Sunday, January 8, 2012

Opinionator | Borderlines: Fighting over Parsley

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
BorderlinesBorderlines explores the global map, one line at a time.

On July 11, 2002, six Moroccan gendarmes occupied Isla de Perejil [1], or Parsley Island, an uninhabited, Spanish-administered rock of about 37 acres, just 220 yards off the Moroccan coast. If the standoff had lasted longer than a few days, and if blood had actually been spilled, we might now know it as the Parsley War. But on July 18, they were overwhelmed and forcibly ejected by Equipo 31, a crack team of Spanish special forces soldiers. No shots were fired.

And that was that. Morocco and Spain agreed to return to the status quo ante [2]: Spain’s claim to the island would remain disputed, but not actively challenged, by Morocco. The island itself would remain unoccupied by either side. Isla de Perejil’s non-occupation is now closely monitored by both the Moroccans and the Spanish (though it’s unclear whether the Moroccan goatherd who occasionally used to graze his flock on the island now has to show his passport).

Apart from that, the case seems closed. But in this part of the world, few things are merely what they seem [3]. Known to the ancients as the Pillars of Hercules, the strategically important gateway between the Atlantic and the Mediterranean is laced with mirroring versions of history — a commodity in no short supply here. Those versions of history have even left mirroring border phenomena on either side of the Strait of Gibraltar.

Perejil is one of seven Spanish territories on and off the Moroccan coast, once known collectively as “plazas de soberanía.” The two main ones are Ceuta and Melilla, two cities on the African mainland. Formerly called the “Major Plazas,” they are now each enjoying a separate, autonomous status within Spain. The remaining “Minor Plazas,” apart from Perejil, are all garrisoned with Spanish soldiers: the Islas Chafarinas, a three-island archipelago near the Algerian border; Alboran, a flat and empty fleck of land flanked by tiny Isla de las Nubes; and finally Pe?ón [4] de Alhucemas (which includes the two minuscule islets called Isla de Tierra and Isla de Mar) and Pe?ón de Vélez de la Gomera, both on Morocco’s central Mediterranean coast, not far from the city of El Hoceima. Morocco claims both autonomous cities and all of the plazas, except Alboran, 30 miles out to sea, the only bit of Spanish North Africa not hugging the Moroccan coastline.

Joe Burgess/The New York Times

Opposite Ceuta, across the STROG [5], is Gibraltar (“Gib” in British parlance), captured by the British in 1704 and granted to them “in perpetuity” by the Treaty of Utrecht, which ended the War of Spanish Succession in 1713. The Spanish have never accepted the loss of Gibraltar, besieging it on three occasions and most recently blockading it from 1969 to 1985.

It seems illogical, not to mention a bit petty, of the Spanish to demand the return of Gibraltar while they cling to their toeholds on the Moroccan side. But Spain’s position is cherry-picked from two opposing principles: Either occupying strategic bits of another country’s coast is an affront to its territorial integrity, in which case Spain can rightly claim Gibraltar but has to renounce its plazas and autonomous cities in North Africa, or Spain’s historic rights to those places can be maintained forever, in which case the same applies for British sovereignty over Gibraltar.

Naturally, Spain has an internally consistent way out of this conundrum: Ceuta and Melilla were Spanish cities long before present-day Morocco existed [6], so it can’t claim them. But Gibraltar was ripped from the bosom of the Spanish state and has been a British colony ever since — in fact, the last colony on European soil [7]. And what should happen to colonies? Right, they should be decolonized.

Another solution, examined first by the British in 1917 and then proposed independently by Spain’s King Alfonso in 1926, was an exchange between Spain and Britain, with Gibraltar reverting to Spain and Ceuta (and possibly also Melilla) becoming British. The swap would have been an interesting new chapter in the long association of Ceuta and Gibraltar. Both exclaves, barely 14 miles apart, poke into the strait, guarding this chokepoint of naval traffic between the Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Seen from above, they look like the hinges of a door that can be opened and shut by whomever controls them. Seen from the sea, Gibraltar’s Rock and Ceuta’s Monte Hacho [8] could be mistaken for the northern and southern pillars of a gigantic gate.

Google Earth

In fact, both rocks are the actual Pillars of Hercules known to the ancients, named after the legendary hero because they marked the westernmost extent of his 12 Labors. To the Greeks and Romans, the Pillars of Hercules were the proverbial end of the world. Tradition has it that the inscription on them warned “Nec Plus Ultra,” or “Beyond this, there’s nothing.”

That changed when Columbus brought back news of lands beyond the ocean, and riches beyond compare. The personal badge of Emperor Charles V, who ruled Spain soon after the discovery of the Americas, showed both pillars interwoven with the slogan: “Plus Ultra” — “There is more out there,” the perfect motto for a nascent transatlantic empire. Charles’s badge is at the origin of Spain’s coat of arms (which still shows both pillars), and possibly also of the dollar sign [9] — the two vertical bars being abstract renderings of Gibraltar and Ceuta, and the curling motto reduced to the S-shape that connects them.

(Nec) Plus Ultra: the pillars as endpoint or gateway. Again, two competing versions of history. And Ceuta and Gibraltar are connected by yet another history with two wildly differing versions. Early in the Eighth Century, Julian [10], a count tasked with “holding Ceuta for Christendom,” switched sides, exhorting and aiding the Muslim invaders of North Africa to cross the strait to Spain. The Muslim conquest of the Iberian Peninsula began when their general Tariq ibn Ziyad landed at Mons Calpe in 711, henceforth renamed Jebel Tariq — i.e. Gibraltar.

Legend has it that Julian wanted revenge for the honor of his daughter Florinda, ravished by Roderic, the last Visigoth king of Spain. Muslim sources later described her as innocence incarnate, while Christian scribes depicted her as a loose woman — respectively maximizing and minimizing Julian’s casus belli. In Spanish history, Julian is the ultimate traitor, opening up the country to seven centuries of Moorish rule. But in his 1970 novel “Count Julian,” the Spanish writer Juan Goytisolo takes the alleged traitor’s side, relishing in the destruction of Spain.

Examples of this mutability of allegiance persist across the strait. Spain’s claims to Gibraltar are supported by … Morocco — for surely, a return of Gib to Spain must mean a return of Ceuta to Morocco. Spain’s claims to Perejil are supported by Algeria, Morocco’s unfriendly neighbor, but not by Spain’s fellow European Union member France, Morocco’s former colonial overlord.

Perhaps Gibraltar is the northernmost part of Africa, for its Barbary Macaques are the only monkeys living in the wild in Europe [11]. And maybe Melilla is the southernmost city of Europe, because its Capilla de Santiago (St James’s Chapel) is the only gothic church in Africa.

All the while, the peculiar borders of these exclaves persist, and harden and soften according to circumstance. Spain and Britain’s co-membership of the European Union was instrumental in ending the blockade of Gibraltar, normalizing the border at La Linea — no longer a three-quarter mile strip of no man’s land garnished with barbed wire.

Read previous contributions to this series.

But the persistent disagreement between Spain and Morocco over the plazas, coupled with an increase in undocumented migration from Africa into Europe, has put Spain on the spot. For many thousands of poor Africans seeking a better life in Europe, Ceuta and Melilla are the entry points into the First World. The barbed-wire fence around both territories is hardly an impediment for those daring and hardy enough to trek across the Sahara.

Some in Spain suspect the periodic surges of migrants into its two African cities are co-orchestrated by Morocco, to underscore their untenability as Spanish, and EU, exclaves in Africa. But ironically, the surges more likely result from the improved Spanish surveillance of the strait, which many migrants try to cross. Like the flow of a river, the phenomenon of mass migration simply seeks the most convenient channel for its course. Hence the poor, huddled masses of boat people reaching Italy’s southernmost island Lampedusa, and likewise the Canary Islands, Spain’s archipelago off Morocco’s Atlantic coast.

For them too, the Strait of Gibraltar no longer is the Nec Plus Ultra of their dreams.

Frank Jacobs is a London-based author and blogger. He writes about cartography, but only the interesting bits.

[1] The official Moroccan nomenclature is “Tura,” which in Berber means “uninhabited,” but also used is “Leila,” which probably is a loan from the Spanish “la isla” (“the island”).

[2] In full: status quo ante bellum, “the state of things before the war.” This principle of international law holds that territorial conquest in battle should be nullified after the end of hostilities. The opposite principle, used to justify territorial gains, is uti possidetis — in full, uti possidetis, ita possideatis, “as you possessed [it], you shall possess [it] from now on.”

[3] For starters, how about the intriguing similarities between the Parsley Incident and the Falklands War, fought two decades earlier? Both involve failed attempts by former European colonies to reclaim islands off their coast held by former European superpowers. Kennedy-Lincoln assassination similarity buffs, start your engines!

[4] Literally a crag (a steep rocky outcrop), the Spanish word pe?ón has also come to mean a Spanish military outpost at such a location. Apart from the two mentioned here, other examples include the Pe?ón de Argel (i.e. Algiers), occupied by Spain from 1510 to 1529.

[5] Naval speak for the Strait of Gibraltar.

[6] 1640 and 1497, respectively. Morocco became independent from France in early 1956. Spanish Morocco — a protectorate since 1912 , not to be confused with the plazas — was allowed to join French Morocco in independence a few months later.

[7] Gibraltar had the status of Crown Colony from 1830 to 1981; in 2002, it was re-classified as a British Overseas Territory. Gibraltar has its own elected government, and thus claims no longer to be a colony, but Spain resists attempts to remove it from the UN Special Committee on Decolonization’s list of Non-Self-Governing Territories (16 at present, of which 10 are under British jurisdiction).

[8] Elevations 1,400 and 670 feet respectively; another candidate for the southern pillar is the Jebel Musa (2,800 feet), just beyond Ceuta’s border with Morocco.

[9] The pillars were pictured on the reverse of the Spanish dollar, legal tender in the United States until 1857.

[10] He might also have been called Urbano, or Ulban. He may have been a Berber, a Visigoth or a Byzantine. Perhaps he was the local ruler of Ceuta, or merely its governor. [11] According to tradition, the extinction of the Gibraltar macaques would signal the end of British rule over the Rock. A similar legend requires the Tower of London to house six raven, lest the monarchy should fail.


View the original article here

World Briefing | Africa: South Sudan: Civilians Flee

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
An Innocent in America Room for Debate: Are Teachers Overpaid? China Set to Punish Human Rights Activist A Renewed Optimism for Deals On Wall Street Competing histories across the Strait of Gibraltar contribute to its peculiar exclaves.

‘Glee’ Star Gets His Broadway Turn Medicare should demand evidence that a costly cancer treatment is more effective than cheaper options.

In Nigeria, designating Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist group will only inflame anti-Americanism among Muslims.


View the original article here

Workers Locked Out at Caterpillar Locomotive Plant in Canada

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

The action came after the employees in London, Ontario, rejected a contract proposed by Electro-Motive Canada. The Canadian Auto Workers union said the proposal would cut wages in half, substantially reduce benefits and end the current pension plan.

“It’s not really a proposal, it’s an ultimatum,” said Tim Carrie, president of the union local that represents the factory’s workers. “This is an attack on middle-class jobs.”

On a Web site with updates about the dispute, Electro-Motive, which Caterpillar acquired in 2010, said the lockout would remain in effect “until a ratified contract is in place.”

The company said the union’s decision not to strike constituted “acceptance of the new wages and benefits as represented in EMC’s final offer.” The company said it was “hopeful of a speedy ratification allowing union members to return to work.”

But some of the union’s executive members have suggested that Caterpillar’s contract demands were intended to provoke a shutdown of the Canadian factory as a prelude to moving all production to the United States.

Caterpillar has a long history of tough labor negotiations and bitter labor disputes. In 1995, workers at the company’s unionized operations in the United States returned to work after declaring a 17-month strike a failure. In 2009, workers took executives at Caterpillar France hostage during a dispute over the restructuring of operations in Grenoble.

Electro-Motive is the second-largest maker of locomotives in North America, after General Electric, and for most of its history was a unit of General Motors. While the parent company, Electro-Motive Diesel, is based in LaGrange, Ill., its only assembly plant in recent years has been the Canadian operation.

But last October, Progress Rail, Caterpillar’s rail operations holding company, opened a new locomotive assembly plant in Muncie, Ind.

The Canadian Auto Workers say that wages and benefits are substantially lower at the new American factory.

The union has suggested that, in addition to reducing labor costs, the company may also want to end Canadian production to avoid potential problems with “Buy American” provisions of United States government procurement rules. While the United States government has said that Canada is exempt from any such measures, labor leaders say that has not always been the case in practice.

The purchase of Electro-Motive Canada was reviewed by the Canadian government under the nation’s foreign investment laws. The union has asked the government to release what conditions, if any, were attached to the subsequent approval. The Canadian government recently settled a dispute with United States Steel under those laws after the company shut down a Canadian steel maker shortly after acquiring it.

“When a foreign company comes in and purchases an existing facility, there has to be a benefit to Canadians,” said Mr. Carrie, the union executive. “Americans coming in and trying to slash wages in half is not a benefit to Canadians.”

Industry Canada, the government department that handles investment reviews, was closed for the New Year holiday on Monday and did not respond to requests for comment.

Anne Marie Quinn, a spokeswoman for Electro-Motive Canada, declined to answer questions about the company’s contract demands, its long-term production plans or any commitments made to the Canadian government.

The company’s Web site about the labor dispute, though, said that the cost of wages and benefits for its workers in Illinois, who are represented by the United Automobile Workers, is about half that for the London plant.

The site says that the now-expired contract at the Canadian factory “also has?antiquated work rules that make the London operation inefficient.”


View the original article here

Saturday, January 7, 2012

President Lee Myung-bak of South Korea Predicts Changes in Peninsula

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Kim Jong-un visited with members of a tank division in a photograph released Sunday by North Korea's official news agency.

SEOUL, South Korea — President Lee Myung-bak of South Korea vowed on Monday to “deal strongly with any provocations” from the North, predicting a “big change” on the divided Korean Peninsula following the death of the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-il, and his untested young son’s rise to power.

Metro Twitter Logo.Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.

In his nationally televised New Year’s speech, Mr. Lee did not elaborate on what change he foresaw. But policy-makers and analysts in the region are closely watching whether the designated successor in the North, Kim Jong-un, who is believed to be in his 20s, can consolidate his grip on power or will depend on caretakers and even regents to run the country, and how that might affect the country’s external policies, especially its nuclear weapons programs.

“A big change is expected in the situation on the Korean Peninsula and northeast Asia following the death of Chairman Kim Jong-il,” Mr. Lee said. “The situation on the Korean Peninsula is now entering a new turning point. But there should be a new opportunity amid changes and uncertainty.”

Mr. Lee’s warning against North Korean provocations came amid fears that the North, as it has in the past, might attempt military or terrorist attacks on the South to reinforce internal unity at a time of sensitive transition and to boost a new leader’s military credentials.

Over the weekend, North Korea made Mr. Kim supreme commander of the 1.2 million-member Korean People’s Army, a move considered crucial to protecting his power, and issued a series of statements calling Mr. Lee’s government in Seoul “national traitors” and vowing “punishment” and “revenge.”

Mr. Lee, though, kept open the possibility of inter-Korean talks despite North Korea’s repeated statements that it had no intention of dealing with his government.

“It is South and North Korea, before anyone else, that must try to achieve the task of building peace, security and reunification on the Korean Peninsula,” he said. “We are leaving a window of opportunity open. If North Korea shows its attitude of sincerity, a new era on the Korean Peninsula can be opened.”

He urged North Korea to suspend its nuclear activities, including its uranium-enrichment program, so that six-nation talks can resume to discuss eliminating its nuclear weapons programs in return for security guarantees and economic assistance for the North.

Mr. Lee’s speech came a day after North Korea issued a New Year’s Day statement that sought to cement support for Mr. Kim and his family’s dynastic rule. It also lambasted South Korea for not expressing official condolences for Kim Jong-il’s death.

In his speech, Mr. Lee called taming inflation and creating jobs two of his top goals as he entered his last year in office. (By law, he cannot run in the next presidential election in December.) He also apologized for a recent series of corruption scandals that implicated his former aides and relatives.

“While economic growth is important, I will focus on bringing consumer prices down,” he said, promising to keep inflation below 3.5 percent this year. South Korea’s consumer prices rose 4.2 percent last month.


View the original article here

WORLD: A Date With the Censors

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Reality TV shows have become common on Chinese television but the sometimes racy and materialistic content has attracted the attention of China’s censors.

Produced by Jonah M. Kessel and Edward Wong


View the original article here

The Lede Blog: Activists Document Raids on Civil Society Groups and a Protest in Cairo

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
A video interview with Julie Hughes, the director of the National Democratic Institute’s office in Egypt, which was raided by the authorities on Thursday, posted online by Wafd, an Egyptian political party.

Updated | 8:01 p.m. As my colleagues David Kirkpatrick and David Goodman report, “Egyptian security forces stormed the offices of 17 nonprofit groups around the country on Thursday, including at least three democracy-promotion groups financed by the United States, as part of what Egypt’s military-led government has said is an investigation into ‘foreign hands’ in the recent outbreak of protests.”

Sarah Carr, a journalist and rights activist, uploaded several photographs of the raid on the office of the National Democratic Institute, which is financed by the United States government and affiliated with the Democratic Party.

While Ms. Carr was forced to observe the raid from outside the organization’s office, she was also in touch with Hana Elhattab, an Egyptian who works with the National Democratic Institute and posted several updates on her Twitter feed from inside the office during the raid. In a series of updates over the course of about two hours, she reported that the heavily-armed officers refused to allow employees to leave the premises, were “taking pictures like it’s a crime scene” and confiscated equipment, “even taking empty flip charts, personal laptops, and Skype conferencing equipment.”

Ms. Elhattab managed to keep providing updates on the raid as it unfolded, and her Twitter timeline detailed the anger and frustration of an Egyptian working to promote democracy being treated like a criminal by the country’s military government.

Since the raid came on the same day that some Egyptian officers were acquitted of killing protesters on Jan. 28, the day that Egypt’s revolution took hold, Ms. Elhattab also used her Twitter feed to express her rage.

Another activist blogger who documented the raid from outside the National Democratic Institute office, Mostafa Hussein, posted on his Twitter feed a photograph of boxes of confiscated equipment, and wrote: “At NDI, they’re confiscating everything. Video conf. equip, printers, laptops, server. There is an archive at the garage they’re going thru.”

The security forces also raided the Cairo office of a similar democracy-promoting organization affiliated with the Republican Party, the International Republican Institute. As the blogger Mohamed El Dahshan noted on Twitter, the Egyptian newspaper Al Ahram reported last month that an Egyptian government investigation into the finances of nonprofit groups said that the the N.D.I. and I.R.I. had received $6.7 million from the State Department this year.

Shadi Hamid, the director of research at the Brookings Doha Center, observed, the Egyptian military, which takes $1.3 billion in aid a year from the United States, is not well-placed to argue that groups sponsored by the American government are suspect.

Despite the fact that they accept so much money from the U.S. government themselves, Egypt’s military rulers seem to be emulating the Kremlin, which temporarily suspended the work of both the National Democratic Institute and the International Republican Institute in 2006, after accusing them of instigating or assisting the so-called “color revolutions” in other former Soviet republics.

Earlier this month, the Russian government harassed Golos, an election-monitoring group partially financed by the United States through the N.D.I. As my colleague Ellen Barry reported, on the eve of Russia’s parliamentary elections, state-controlled television “aired a documentary suggesting that Golos was being used by Western governments to spark Arab-spring-style civil unrest after the Russian elections.”

Later on Thursday, a number of activists posted photographs and text updates on the progress of a protest march in Cairo, which drew attention to the plight of a blogger who was jailed in April for “insulting the military” on Facebook.

As The Lede explained in a previous post on the jailed Coptic Christian blogger, Maikel Nabil, the fact that he is both an opponent of Egypt’s military and an outspoken supporter of Israel makes his case unusually complicated.

However, discontent with the military rulers of the country has grown since his arrest. As this video — produced by Aalam Wassef, an activist campaigning for the blogger’s release — shows, his supporters argue that Mr. Nabil was one of the first to suggest that the army was not, in fact, on the side of the protesters.As the video indicates, Mr. Nabil was prosecuted after he argued on his blog that the revolutionary slogan “The People and the Army Are One Hand” was misguided from the start.

Since many Egyptians without access to the Internet or satellite channels never see video like this documenting abuses by the military government, activists have started to bring projectors with them to protests, to screen the footage in public. An activist who writes on Twitter as The Big Pharaoh posted this image on Thursday night of video of a recent attack on protesters by soldiers on the outside wall of Egypt’s high court.


View the original article here

American Awaits Verdict After Iran Spy Trial, Report Says

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Amir Mirza Hekmati, a 28-year-old of Iranian descent, could face the death penalty if found guilty of cooperating with a hostile government and spying for the CIA. He was arrested in December.

Iran's Intelligence Ministry accused Hekmati of receiving training at U.S. bases in neighboring Afghanistan and Iraq.

Shortly after his detention, state television showed a taped interview of him confessing to being a spy. At his trial he admitted to having links with the CIA but said he had no intention of harming Iran.

The trial comes at a time of heightened tension between Iran and the United States, which is leading efforts to tighten sanctions on Tehran because of its controversial nuclear program.

U.S. State Department spokesman Mark Toner last week urged Tehran to release Hekmati immediately.

He said that Switzerland, which represents U.S. interests in Iran in the absence of formal diplomatic ties, had formally requested permission for consular access to Hekmati on December 24 but Iran had refused.

"America's request for the return of the accused, indicates their utmost impudence and he should be tried based on the country's laws," justice ministry spokesman Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei said.

Iran said in May it had arrested 30 people on suspicion of spying for the United States, and 15 people were later indicted for spying for Washington and Israel.

(Writing by Mitra Amiri; Editing by Ben Harding)


View the original article here